Australia to Review the Ratings of 12 Games

Thursday, November 7th, 2013

Share this page

We are proudly a Play-Asia Partner

SUPPORT OPRAINFALL BY TURNING OFF ADBLOCK

Ads support the website by covering server and domain costs. We're just a group of gamers here, like you, doing what we love to do: playing video games and bringing y'all niche goodness. So, if you like what we do and want to help us out, make an exception by turning off AdBlock for our website. In return, we promise to keep intrusive ads, such as pop-ups, off oprainfall. Thanks, everyone!

By


Australian Government Classification Review Board | Announcement of Classification Review of 12 Games

The Australian Government’s Classification Review Board, an independent statutory body that reviews decisions made by the Australian Classification Board (OFLC), will be reviewing the ratings for 12 games. South Australian Attorney-General John Rau, who requested this review last September, felt the new rules have not been applied as strongly as they should have been. The ratings for the following games are under review.

  • Killer is Dead
  • Alien Rage
  • Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell Blacklist
  • Deadly Premonition: The Director’s Cut
  • Company of Heroes 2
  • God Mode
  • Borderlands 2 Add-on Content Pack
  • Fuse
  • Deadpool
  • The Walking Dead
  • Gears of War: Judgment
  • The Walking Dead: Survival Instinct

Back in September, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation quoted Rau as saying, “It is concerning to me, particularly as a parent, when I see that 13 games have been released in Australia as MA15+ whilst exactly the same game attracts up to an R18+ classification overseas.”

The Interactive Games and Entertainment Association has come forward to defend the current ratings. “Most people don’t realize that before a video game lands on a store shelf, it has already been rigorously examined against a set of guidelines set out by our Government,” said Ron Curry, CEO of IGEA. “In fact, Australia is one of the few developed nations to have classification guidelines determined by Government.” He goes on to point out that no formal complaints have been made against the current ratings and that a review would be “unwarranted and costly.”

Australia has only recently created the R18+ rating, but only a handful of games (Grand Theft Auto V, Ninja Gaiden 3: Razor’s Edge) have actually received the rating since its inception. Every game on this list has a Mature (M) ESRB rating in the U.S. and Canada or PEGI 18 in Europe. However, the OFLC classified these games unedited as MA15+, just one step below R18+.

To say that Australia’s history with video game ratings has been messy would be like saying you shouldn’t swan-dive into an erupting volcano. Before the existence of the R18+ rating, most mature titles sold in Australia were normally edited or censored to fit the guidelines for an MA15+ rating. But some managed to pass by unedited, such as Dead Space 3 and Dante’s Inferno. Saints Row IV was in the news recently for being denied classification twice by Australia, but after cutting out one mission concerning drug use, the game became eligible for the MA15+ rating.

The U.S. is also no stranger to reclassification. Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas had its rating changed from M to the kiss-of-death rating that is Adults Only (AO) as a result of the Hot Coffee scandal.

SOURCE

About Karli Winata

Karli Winata is an avid gamer with a taste for a little bit of everything. Except for sports games. And racing sims. And definitely not hidden object games! I guess everything is too broad a term. Suffice it to say that he has been known to play hours of Call of Duty multiplayer in between bouts of Persona fusing and Star Coin collecting while saving the world/galaxy through sensibly bald space marines or plucky teenagers with impossible hairstyles. Where does he find the time to write about them?




  • What asshattery is this? Not every country has a rating between 13 and 18.

  • Thanatos2k

    Sure, whatever. The problem is when you refuse games the R18 classification so you can ban them. How about you re-review those?